In re A.D.

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 2442

Syllabus

MOTION TO COMPEL JUV.R. 22 JUV.R. 24 EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW ADMISSION JUV.R. 29 MOTION TO CONTINUE JUV.R. 23 GUARDIAN AD LITEM'S TESTIMONY AND RECOMMENDATION SUP. R. 48.03 LEGAL CUSTODY BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD SELF-INCRIMINATION EX PARTE EMERGENCY HEARING VERIFICATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION R.C. 3119.05 GROSS INCOME POTENTIAL INCOME R.C. 3119.01 COURT-CHILD-SUPPORT ORDERS. The trial court did not err by denying the appellants' motions to compel, to withdraw their admission to dependency, and to continue the dispositional hearing. The appellants' were not denied effective assistance of counsel at adjudication. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by considering the guardian ad litem's testimony and recommendation at the dispositional hearing. The trial court did not err by granting legal custody of the child to the maternal grandparents. The trial court did not violate the appellants' right against self-incrimination since self-incrimination was never implicated under the facts presented. The appellants' waived their right to challenge magistrate's temporary-custody orders at the shelter-care and adjudicatory hearings. The trial court did not err by establishing child-support orders based upon the appellants' imputed potential income without verification of financial information. Judgment Affirmed.