In re X.S.

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 1774

Syllabus

The trial court's decision to award permanent custody of the children to the agency is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The agency submitted adoption plans sufficient to satisfy its obligations under R.C. 2151.413(E). The trial court did not err by approving and adopting the agency's proposed amendments to the case plans without holding an additional hearing pursuant to father-appellant's \objections.\ The trial court did not commit prejudicial error when it found that the agency had made reasonable efforts to reunite father-appellant with his children.