Skip to main content

In re. S.L.

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1111

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in its finding that S.L. was abused and dependent and that G.L., R.L., B.L. and L.L. were dependent. However, the trial court did err in finding L.L. to be abused. Further, counsel for appellant was not ineffective. Judgment as to L.L. being abused is reversed and remanded to the trial court to vacate adjudication of abuse. All other judgments are affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.