Skip to main content
· 10/28/1996

In Re Morrell

Citations

  • 684 A.2d 361
  • 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 231
  • 1996 WL 626250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in the text of the rules, however, specifies the result of a Hearing Committee’s failure to adhere to the time limit, so we presume that the rule is directory, rather than mandatory.”
  • “It would hardly serve the integrity of the bar . . . to allow [respondent] to avoid the imposition of discipline for his serious ethical violations merely because the Hearing Committee took a long time carefully evaluating the substantial, complex evidence in his case.”
  • “It would hardly serve the integrity of the bar . . . to allow [respondent] to avoid the imposition of discipline for his serious ethical violations merely because the Hearing Committee took a long time carefully evaluating the substantial, complex evidence in his case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferren, Steadman, Ruiz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.