District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/11/2003
In Re Tidwell
Citations
- 831 A.2d 953
- 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 551
- 2003 WL 22097770
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Mr. Tidwell’s situation from that of respondent in earlier case by pointing out that earlier respondent “did not have any alcohol problems, nor was he likely to commit a similar act in the future. The same cannot be said with respect to Mr. Tidwell.”
- noting Mr. Tidwell \suffered from [an] alcohol problem[ ]\
- noting Mr. Tidwell “suffered from [an] alcohol problem[]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Steadman, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re DortchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-10-21· cited 27×
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11· cited 9×
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-11-10· cited 7×
- In re RehbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-02· cited 5×
- In re FarrenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-06-25· cited 3×
- In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-30· cited 1×
- IN RE J. MICHAEL FARRENDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-06-25
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-07-03· cited 136×
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-25· cited 56×
- In Re GilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-04-03· cited 37×
- In Re MorrellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-28· cited 29×
- In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-07-13· cited 21×
- Matter of WolffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-04-08· cited 20×
- Matter of WolffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-06-30· cited 19×
- In Re HopmayerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-05-27· cited 15×
- In Re SneedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-29· cited 15×
- In Re RosenbleetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-11· cited 15×
- In Re ArnejaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-01-31· cited 15×
- In Re KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-07· cited 15×
- In Re DavenportDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-03-28· cited 14×
- In Re ClarkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-11-07· cited 11×
- Johnson v. LeuthongchakDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-05-10· cited 10×
- In Re Drew v. Tidwell, Movant. Drew v. Tidwell, Movant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 9×
- In Re SmallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-10-12· cited 9×
- In Re HoareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-03-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.