E.D. New York· 10/10/2014
In re Merhi
Citations
- 518 B.R. 705
- 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4330
- 2014 WL 5114284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that dismissal is appropriate once it became apparent that the debtor did not have the means to pay the amounts necessary to confirm a plan
- finding debtor’s inability to propose a viable plan to be an unreasonable delay that is prejudicial to creditors and thus warranted dismissal of the case
- continuation of case when debtor cannot propose a confirmable debt adjustment plan constituted prejudicial delay to creditors under 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1)
- “Section 1307(c) provides that cause includes ‘unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors’ and ‘denial of confirmation of a plan under section 1325 of this title.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arenas v. United States Trustee (In re Arenas)Tenth Circuit· 2015-08-21· cited 34×
- In re ZairE.D. New York· 2015-08-13· cited 11×
- In re CoughlinE.D. New York· 2017-06-15· cited 11×
- In re AddamsE.D. New York· 2017-03-09· cited 8×
- Gecker v. LG Funding, LLC (In re Hill)N.D. Illinois· 2018-08-15· cited 4×
- In re HassanE.D. New York· 2015-03-19· cited 3×
- Chiquita Fresh North America, LLC v. Fierman Produce Exchange Inc.E.D. New York· 2016-07-28· cited 2×
- UST - CO v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of ColoradoTenth Circuit· 2015-08-21
- Batac v. BoyajianD. Rhode Island· 2015-07-01
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 5,972×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 4,974×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,838×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- Marvel Characters, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Joseph H. Simon, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 2002-11-07· cited 664×
- Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court· 1998-04-22· cited 412×
- Goodman Ex Rel. Goodman v. SiposEleventh Circuit· 2001-08-02· cited 159×
- Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1981-12-23· cited 105×
- Nicholes v. Johnny Appleseed of Washington (In Re Nicholes)Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 78×
- Henry Modell & Co. v. MinisterNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-11-25· cited 74×
- Grimes v. Fremont General Corp.S.D. New York· 2011-03-31· cited 65×
- Rene v. CITIBANK NAE.D. New York· 1999-01-11· cited 63×
- Szerdahelyi v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-02-13· cited 58×
- American General Finance, Inc. v. Paschen (In Re Paschen)Eleventh Circuit· 2002-07-10· cited 54×
- In Re Clarence Gordon Witt Carolyn Sue Witt, Debtors. Clarence Gordon Witt Carolyn Sue Witt v. United Companies Lending CorporationFourth Circuit· 1997-05-21· cited 54×
- Yeiser v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.S.D. New York· 2008-02-18· cited 43×
- First National Bank v. Fantasia (In Re Fantasia)First Circuit· 1997-08-26· cited 41×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2002-03-01· cited 37×
- Charell v. Gonzalez (In Re Gonzalez)S.D. New York· 1999-11-18· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.