Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 10/10/2014

In re Merhi

Citations

  • 518 B.R. 705
  • 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4330
  • 2014 WL 5114284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that dismissal is appropriate once it became apparent that the debtor did not have the means to pay the amounts necessary to confirm a plan
  • finding debtor’s inability to propose a viable plan to be an unreasonable delay that is prejudicial to creditors and thus warranted dismissal of the case
  • continuation of case when debtor cannot propose a confirmable debt adjustment plan constituted prejudicial delay to creditors under 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(1)
  • “Section 1307(c) provides that cause includes ‘unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors’ and ‘denial of confirmation of a plan under section 1325 of this title.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.