Grimes v. Fremont General Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Plaintiffs admitted that “they had then-lawyer with them at the closing”
• finding that continuing violation doctrine did not apply where plaintiff made only general assertions about defendants’ conduct within the limitations period, distinguishing Barkley, wherein plaintiffs made concrete allegations regarding sales during the statutory period
• collecting cases finding that conclusory allegations of discrimination do not state a claim for discrimination under Section 1981
• “However, certain types of transactions are specifically exempted from this right of rescission [under TILA], including ‘a residential mortgage transaction.’ ”
• conclusory allegations of discrimination, unsupported by specific factual allegations are insufficient to state a claim under civil rights statutes
• where there is no right to recission under TILA, “[d]efendants were not required to provide notice of a right to rescission, and their alleged failure to do so was not a TILA violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).