In re Hassan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “abandonment is proper only when the party seeking abandonment can establish that the property at issue is burdensome or of inconsequential value and benefit to the estate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 4,974×
• Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1995-11-15· cited 2,273×
• Julia Karen Eisemann v. Miriam Greene, M.D.
  Second Circuit· 2000-02-17· cited 179×
• Associated Press v. United States Department of Defense
  S.D. New York· 2005-09-26· cited 163×
• Schonberger v. Serchuk
  S.D. New York· 1990-08-02· cited 119×
• Baker v. Simpson
  Second Circuit· 2010-07-30· cited 100×
• In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Lit.
  S.D. New York· 2005-06-28· cited 65×
• Corines v. American Physicians Insurance Trust
  S.D. New York· 2011-04-26· cited 35×
• Book v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
  D. Connecticut· 2009-03-26· cited 22×
• In re Merhi
  E.D. New York· 2014-10-10· cited 18×
• In re Richmond
  E.D. New York· 2014-09-29· cited 9×
• Krohn v. Burton (In re Swift)
  E.D. New York· 2014-11-03· cited 3×

Other cases named In re Hassan

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In re Hassan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1945-05-07
• In re Hassan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1959-04-27
• In re Hassan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-09