Skip to main content
· 3/1/2002

Federal Case

Citations

  • 282 F.3d 185
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • legislative history and other tools of interpretation may be relied upon if terms of federal statute are ambiguous
  • “[I]t is an open question under New York law whether a criminally usurious loan is void.”
  • “[N]o New York usury law prohibits, voids, or regulates transactions over $2.5 million, a financial plane above which all players apparently are deemed to be able to fend for themselves.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.