Skip to main content

In re L.M.

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1630

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err by denying appellant's two motions to intervene in the proceedings involving her two grandchildren that were initiated by appellee, a children services agency, after the children were removed from the care of their mother and father and placed in appellee's temporary custody where appellant could not intervene of right under Civ.R. 24(A) and had not stood in loco parentis with her two grandchildren so as to allow for permissive intervention under Civ.R. 24(B).

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.