Skip to main content
· 7/26/2021

Reisinger v. Topping

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2545

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err by designating appellee as the residential parent and legal custodian of her and appellant's son where that decision was in the child's best interest. The same holds true as it relates to the juvenile court's decision awarding appellant with its standard order of parenting time. The juvenile court also did not err by denying appellant's motion for contempt against appellee where appellant failed to meet his burden of proof, or by ordering appellant to pay all court costs associated with the case given appellant's poor case management and unnecessary insistence on litigating every aspect of this case.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.