Snell v. Howell
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1522
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it modified Father's child support order. The magistrate properly found that circumstances had substantially changed where Father failed to exercise all his court-ordered parenting time and failed to pay for daycare as previously agreed, and therefore the previous downward deviation in Father's support payment was no longer in the best interest of the children.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “United National timely and explicitly reserved its right to recoup defense costs because United National notified SST of the reservation, in a letter dated January 21, 1997, prior to payment of the defense costs.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.