Skip to main content

In re T.I.

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 292

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not commit error, plain or otherwise, by allowing the introduction of appellant's supposed confession into evidence where appellant was not subject to custodial interrogation, nor did the juvenile court err in the conditions it imposed upon appellant as part of his probation, given that appellant's adjudication as a delinquent child was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.