In re A.T.

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1803

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err by classifying appellant's \Modification of Custody\ motion as a motion to modify his and appellee's shared parenting plan rather than a motion to terminate their shared parenting agreement given appellant never requested the juvenile court terminate the shared parenting agreement, nor did the juvenile court err by finding no change of circumstances had occurred that would justify a modification of his and appellee's shared parenting plan where the alleged \changes\ that appellant alleged justified a modification to the shared parenting plan were slight and inconsequential.