Skip to main content

In re Spencer

Citations

  • 355 Or. 679
  • 330 P.3d 538
  • 2014 WL 3326448
  • 2014 Ore. LEXIS 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that RPC 1.8(a) “serves as a general prophylactic against lawyers entering into business transactions with clients”
  • rejecting Bar’s argu- ment that client had been a vulnerable victim because she was an “unsophisticated client in desperate financial circum- stances”; client was not an unsophisticated purchaser and had owned property, worked as a comptroller, and regularly handled financial matters
  • rejecting Bar’s argu- ment that client had been a vulnerable victim because she was an “unsophisticated client in desperate financial circum- stances”; client was not an unsophisticated purchaser and had owned property, worked as a comptroller, and regularly handled financial matters
  • court did not address theory of “personal interest” not alleged as con- flict of interest violation
  • court did not address theory of “personal interest” not alleged as conflict of interest violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.