Skip to main content
· 4/2/1985

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dugger

Citations

  • 697 P.2d 973
  • 299 Or. 21
  • 1985 Ore. LEXIS 1089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • 63-day suspension for violations of former DR 1-102(A)(4) (misrepresentation), DR 1-103(C), and former DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter
  • 63-day suspension for violating current DR 6-101(B), current DR 1-102(A)(3) and current DR 1-103(C) (failure to cooperate with the Bar’s disciplinary investigation)
  • 63-day suspension imposed when accused lawyer neglected client’s case and misrepresented to the client the status of his case
  • lawyer failed to inform client that case strategy was jeopardized and failed to respond to client’s inquiries; client lost opportunity to collect on construction lien
  • lawyer guilty of neglect when, after filing construction lien for client, he determined that case lacked merit but never informed client or followed through with matter and did not return client telephone calls

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.