· 4/2/1985
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dugger
Citations
- 697 P.2d 973
- 299 Or. 21
- 1985 Ore. LEXIS 1089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- 63-day suspension for violations of former DR 1-102(A)(4) (misrepresentation), DR 1-103(C), and former DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter
- 63-day suspension for violating current DR 6-101(B), current DR 1-102(A)(3) and current DR 1-103(C) (failure to cooperate with the Bar’s disciplinary investigation)
- 63-day suspension imposed when accused lawyer neglected client’s case and misrepresented to the client the status of his case
- lawyer failed to inform client that case strategy was jeopardized and failed to respond to client’s inquiries; client lost opportunity to collect on construction lien
- lawyer guilty of neglect when, after filing construction lien for client, he determined that case lacked merit but never informed client or followed through with matter and did not return client telephone calls
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.