Skip to main content

In Re Morris

Citations

  • 953 P.2d 387
  • 326 Or. 493
  • 1998 Ore. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that statute prohibiting lawyer from “willfully” engaging in particular conduct required lawyer to act intentionally to be subject to discipline under statute
  • continuing to represent former personal representative after agreeing to represent successor created a current client conflict of interest where attorney pursued former personal representative’s claim against the estate for attorney fees
  • imposing 120-day suspension for submitting altered documents to court and opposing parties
  • 120-day suspension for veteran lawyer with no prior disciplinary record who violated rules governing conflicts, dishonesty, and false statements of fact
  • 120-day suspension for conflict of interest aggravated by “misrepresentation” in violation of DR 1-102(A)(3)
  • four-month suspension for violation of conflict-of-interest rule where mitigating factors outweighed aggravating factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Graber, Durham, Kulongoski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.