Skip to main content

In Re Johnson

Citations

  • 598 N.E.2d 406
  • 232 Ill. App. 3d 1068
  • 174 Ill. Dec. 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that once documents are filed with the court, they lose their private nature and become part of the court file and public components of the judicial proceeding to which the right of access attaches
  • reversing the trial court, which had denied access to the media intervenors in a civil case
  • reversing the trial court, which had denied access to the media intervenors in a civil case
  • access to judicial records is left to sound discretion of trial court based on the relevant facts and circumstances of the case
  • ‘The parties’ desire and agreement that the court records were to be sealed falls far short of outweighing the public’s right of access to the files.’
  • access to judicial records is left to sound discretion of trial court based on the relevant facts and circumstances of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.