Shenandoah Publishing House, Inc. v. Fanning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to notice standing argument on brief because it was neither raised in trial court nor assigned as error
• refusing to notice standing argument on brief because it was neither raised in trial court nor assigned as error
• construing current Code § 17.1-208, which “has endured for more than a century” and codified “the generally accepted common-law rule of openness”
• requiring courts to “allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object”
• \a rebuttable presumption of public access applies in civil proceedings to judicial records\
• “a rebuttable presumption of public access applies in civil proceedings to judicial records”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).