Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a contempt order which “accomplishes no more than implementing prior orders” is not final and appealable
• “A contempt order is interlocutory and, thus, nonappealable, unless the court imposes a sanction for any contemptuous act.”
• mere desire for secrecy cannot suffice as a compelling interest
• mere desire for secrecy cannot suffice as a compelling interest
• mere desire for secrecy cannot suffice as a compelling interest
• confidentiality clauses are common attributes of settlement agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).