United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in some situations, a PSI may be disclosed to meet a particularized need arising out of pending or contemplated litigation
• describing Press-Enterprise II as enunciating a two-prong analysis consisting of “experience test” the “logic test”
• weighing defendants’ personal privacy interests when maintaining seal on presentence reports
• weighing defendants' personal privacy interests when maintaining seal on presentence reports
• finding no right to access under the First Amendment: “[w]e believe that Pulitzer’s [the newspaper publisher intervenor] assertion of a right to inspect Corbitt’s presentence report fails to satisfy either prong of this ‘experience and logic’ test”
• press’ right to attend hearing does not necessarily entail right of access to documents submitted for use in hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).