Skip to main content
First Circuit· 12/5/2006

In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.

Citations

  • 471 F.3d 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court may not certify a class without ruling that each Rule 23 requirement is met, even if a requirement overlaps with a merits issue
  • holding that a district court may not certify a class without ruling that each Rule 23 requirement is met, even if a requirement overlaps with a merits issue
  • holding that a district court must make a “definitive assessment of Rule 23 requirements” and “resolve[] factual disputes relevant to each Rule 23 requirement”
  • recognizing that the district court has an \obligation\ to make a \determination that the requirements of Rule 23 are met\
  • recognizing that the district court has an “obligation” to make a “determination that the requirements of Rule 23 are met”
  • concluding that courts must “resolve[] factual disputes relevant to each Rule 23 requirement,” including weighing conflicting opinion evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

285 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.

23 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.