Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the party seeking class certification must demonstrate the putative class’s conformance with Rule 23
• holding that factual findings sufficient to invoke a similar presumption under the NJCFA are “critical to the predominance analysis” and “cannot be side-stepped”
• holding that potential class members submitting affidavits to gain class membership is not proper or just
• holding that “nationwide” evidence “is not necessarily sufficient to establish numerosity” for state-specific classes
• stating that a \court cannot be bashful\ when determining \whether there is actual conformance with Rule 23\
• stating that the numerosity requirement “creates greater access to judicial relief, particularly for those persons with claims that would be uneconomical to litigate individually”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).