S.D. New York· 10/15/2004

In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

Citations

358 F. Supp. 2d 189
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20552
2004 WL 2320364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding a misrepresentation that a defendant got a degree from Stanford University to be material under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, “given the cachet associated with a computer engineering degree” from that institution
“An omission of fact ‘required to be stated’ under Item 303 will generally produce liability under Section 11.”
plaintiffs stated a Section 11 claim where they alleged “specific and factual” omissions regarding the expiration of 75 percent of defendants’ advertising contracts in one month
where the defendant’s statement “specifically indicate[d] that advertising rates may be lower in the future”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.