Gariety v. Grant Thornton, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “individual inquiries into reliance typically preclude a finding that common issues of fact predominate”
• stating that Basic “offers little guidance for determining whether a market is efficient”
• noting that if the jury or factfinder’s “finding on any fact differs from a finding made in connection with class action certification, the ultimate factfinder’s finding on the merits will govern the judgment”
• explaining that courts “should consider factors such as” the Cammer factors (emphasis added)
• remanding the class certification decision for consideration of whether factor (1) had been improperly satisfied by the erroneous application of aiding and abetting liability
• remanding the class certification decision for consideration of whether factor (1) had been improperly satisfied by the erroneous application of aiding and abetting liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).