In re I.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• argument regarding disparity in notification requirements between criminal procedural statutes and juvenile procedural statutes is a policy argument properly left to the Legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Phipps
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2025-06-27
• In re K.S.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2026-03-27

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• In Re GAULT
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
• Patterson v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
• Dowling v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
• Spencer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
• Medina v. California
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
• McKane v. Durston
  Supreme Court· 1894-05-14· cited 592×
• State v. Ortiz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-27· cited 196×
• Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. Svaty
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-12-10· cited 95×
• State v. Patton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-11-14· cited 94×
• Albright v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-05-20· cited 73×
• Guillory v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-11-02· cited 60×
• In re L.M.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20· cited 52×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-03· cited 51×
• State v. Hemphill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-03· cited 35×
• State v. Shelly
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-03-25· cited 33×
• Ware v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1967-04-08· cited 23×
• In re J.P.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-06-26· cited 6×
• In the Interest of B.S.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-03-15· cited 5×