State v. Hemphill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \Ortiz [was] not the appropriate avenue for relief in\ untimely appeal from postsentencing motion to withdraw plea
• recognizing defendant's right to direct appeal from denial of his or her motion to withdraw plea and indicating, without deciding, such appeals \must be filed within the time frame for criminal appeals found in K.S.A. 22-3608\
• affirming Court of Appeals’ remand for Ortiz hearing on late appeal of sentences
• noting, subject to limited exceptions, that if an appeal is not taken within the statutory time period after judgment, the court lacks jurisdiction to consider it
• finding attorney abandoned client when attorney argued against client's interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Patton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-11-14· cited 94×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-05-31· cited 59×
• Stewart v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 36×
• Sherwood v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 23×
• Requena v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 16×
• State v. Storer
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-09-16· cited 14×
• State v. Robertson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-04-19· cited 13×
• State v. Laughlin video
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 10×
• In re I.A.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-07-23· cited 9×
• State v. Hooks
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-01-08· cited 6×
• Harvey v. Auto Plus of Woodward
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-09-13· cited 6×
• In re I.A.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-08-16· cited 4×
• State v. Maberry
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-05-22· cited 1×