In Re Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding because § 1329 does not include any reference to § 1325(b), even though § 1329 includes specific reference to several other Code sections, the requirements of § 1325(b
• moving party bears the burden of showing sufficient facts to indicate that modification of debtors' confirmed chapter 13 plan is warranted
• in n post-BAPCPA case, concluding that projected disposable income test does not apply but that modification may require use of exempt lump-sum social security disability benefits to pay creditors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: DAVID C. WELSH and SHARON N. WELSH
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-03-25· cited 66×
• In re: David C. Welsh and Sharon N. Welsh
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-17· cited 42×
• In Re Mattson
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-05· cited 26×
• In Re Grutsch
  D. Kansas· 2011-06-29· cited 17×
• In Re Welsh
  D. Montana· 2010-11-16· cited 12×
• In re McAllister
  N.D. Georgia· 2014-04-03· cited 10×
• In Re Mattson
  W.D. Washington· 2011-08-26· cited 8×
• In re Cormier
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-09-27· cited 5×
• In re Etwaroo
  E.D. New York· 2016-03-02· cited 4×
• In re Wise
  District of Columbia· 2012-08-16· cited 2×
• In re: Robbyn Dale Mattson and Renee Diane Mattson
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-05

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 1,290×
• Jimenez v. Weinberger
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 343×
• In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-05-03· cited 259×
• Hagel v. Drummond (In Re Hagel)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-07-28· cited 80×
• Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
• Alfred Crawford Daniel Carrasco Jerry Parker v. Russell S. Gould William Mayer, (Two Cases)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-08-25· cited 57×
• Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than)
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 55×
• Powers v. Savage (In Re Powers)
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-11-21· cited 49×
• Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-07· cited 44×
• Fridley v. Forsythe (In Re Fridley)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-18· cited 43×
• McDonald v. Burgie (In Re Burgie)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-31· cited 36×
• In Re Sounakhene
  S.D. California· 2000-06-26· cited 31×
• Profit v. Savage (In Re Profit)
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-09-17· cited 24×
• In Re Ewers
  D. Nevada· 2007-02-26· cited 21×
• In Re McKinney
  D. Oregon· 1996-02-02· cited 15×