S.D. California· 6/26/2000
In Re Sounakhene
Citations
- 249 B.R. 801
- 2000 WL 772345
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “it has generally been held that a plan is ‘complete’ when the debtor makes all the payments to the trustee”
- “The parties agree the Trustee must file his motion before all the payments under the plan are complete.”
- court has discretion to consider important components of disposable income test
- court has discretion to consider important components of disposable income test
- The plain language of § 1329(a) does not include the disposable income requirement, so “the better approach is to utilize the analysis underlying the disposable income test in exercising the court’s judgment and discretion.”
- “Once the payments are complete, a motion to modify is time barred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Louise Decarl Adler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Meza v. Truman (In Re Meza)Fifth Circuit· 2006-10-18· cited 76×
- Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
- In Re WetzelE.D. Wisconsin· 2008-01-29· cited 22×
- In Re DrewN.D. Illinois· 2005-06-23· cited 21×
- In Re GolekN.D. Illinois· 2004-04-15· cited 20×
- In Re JacobsN.D. New York· 2001-05-16· cited 18×
- In Re HallD. Idaho· 2010-08-31· cited 18×
- In Re ZavalaW.D. Texas· 2007-04-11· cited 16×
- In Re MurphyE.D. Virginia· 2005-01-12· cited 14×
- In Re EzzellS.D. Texas· 2010-03-09· cited 13×
- In Re WhiteW.D. North Carolina· 2008-04-17· cited 12×
- In re SalpietroE.D. New York· 2013-06-10· cited 12×
- In re McAllisterN.D. Georgia· 2014-04-03· cited 10×
- In Re FieldsS.D. Ohio· 2001-08-27· cited 8×
- In Re QuevedoS.D. California· 2006-06-15· cited 8×
- In re ConnerD. New Mexico· 2016-10-04· cited 8×
- In Re BrownN.D. Illinois· 2005-07-07· cited 5×
- In Re HiltonE.D. Wisconsin· 2008-10-15· cited 4×
- In Re McCollumE.D. Louisiana· 2006-02-22· cited 3×
- In re PowersC.D. Illinois· 2014-03-28· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)Eighth Circuit· 1997-12-09· cited 105×
- Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than)Ninth Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 55×
- Powers v. Savage (In Re Powers)Ninth Circuit· 1996-11-21· cited 49×
- In Re PhelpsN.D. Illinois· 1993-01-13· cited 43×
- McDonald v. Burgie (In Re Burgie)Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-31· cited 36×
- Casper v. McCullough (In Re Casper)N.D. Illinois· 1993-05-10· cited 34×
- In Re MossC.D. California· 1988-09-26· cited 33×
- In Re MartinD. Massachusetts· 1999-03-17· cited 31×
- Missoula Federal Credit Union v. Reinertson (In Re Reinertson)Ninth Circuit· 1999-11-02· cited 16×
- In Re McCrayS.D. Georgia· 1994-09-15· cited 15×
- In Re EstradaS.D. California· 1998-08-24· cited 12×
- In Re CasperN.D. Illinois· 1993-02-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.