Skip to main content
· 3/25/2013

In Re: DAVID C. WELSH and SHARON N. WELSH

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 1120
  • 2013 WL 1192961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the statute clearly excludes Social Security income
  • listing four factors to determine whether plan is proposed in good 12 || faith, including whether debtors misrepresent facts in their plan
  • “‛current monthly income,’ [] by definition, explicitly ‘excludes benefits received under the Social Security Act’”
  • “Congress has spoken directly, and it explicitly excluded Social Security income from the calculation of disposable income.”
  • “the definition of ‘current monthly income’ excludes Social Security income.”
  • discussing enactment of § 1325(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Trott, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.