Skip to main content
· 7/28/1995

Hagel v. Drummond (In Re Hagel)

Citations

  • 184 B.R. 793
  • 34 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 271
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 11151
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6519
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 8005 “does not provide that the bankruptcy court must stay all proceedings” but that it has discretion to stay any proceedings
  • holding that social security benefits must be included in disposable income despite a debtor’s right to exempt them under state law
  • holding that exempt social security disability benefits are included under a § 1325(b) analysis
  • holding social security disability benefits subject to disposable income test
  • emphasizing the discretion of Rule 8005 in stating a court may suspend other proceedings, not that it must
  • income from social security disability payments included in disposable income devoted to Chapter 13 plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Hagan, Marlar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.