Fridley v. Forsythe (In Re Fridley)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prepayment of a chapter 13 plan does not complete the temporal elements of a plan for purposes of § 1329
• holding that when a confirmed plan specifies a fixed term, “[a] debtor desiring to prepay a chapter 13 plan and obtain an early discharge without paying allowed unsecured claims in full must follow the § 1329 modification procedure.”
• \Subsequent increases in [a debtor’s] actual income can be captured for creditors by way of a § 1329 plan modification . . . .\
• “Before BAPCPA, the § 1325(b)(1) ‘three-year period’ operated as a temporal requirement. After BAPCPA, the § 1325(b)(1
• “[T]he statutory concept of ‘completion’ of payments includes the completion of the requisite period of time.”
• “Subsequent increases in [a debtor’s] actual income can be captured for creditors by way of a § 1329 plan modification . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).