Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 9/26/2011

In Re Flonase Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 815 F. Supp. 2d 867
  • 2011 WL 4464823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The alleged injury central to each of Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ state law claims is an overcharge for Flonase purchases in the purchase states that were either made by or reimbursed by the Plans.”
  • “The state laws at issue here are intended to protect consumers from being overcharged. The purchase states have a serious interest in applying their law to allow consumers (or in this case, the Plans covering the consumers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anita B. Brody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.