Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “absen[t] . . . a showing of particularized danger of unfair prejudice, the evidence must be admitted”
• concluding that small number of people who knew the information in the evidence supported finding of authenticity
• holding that noneonstitu-tional errors in civil suits “are harmless only if it is highly probable that the errors did not affect the outcome of the case”
• considering that documents were produced in response to a discovery request as evidence of authenticity
• stating that “beyond a reasonable doubt” is “a more stringent standard than ‘high probability,’ ” as followed in the Third Circuit
• stating that “beyond a reasonable doubt” is “a more stringent standard than ‘high probability,’ ” as followed in the Third Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).