Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warning courts to avoid dicta on conflicts questions when not put in issue by the parties
• warning courts to avoid dicta on conflicts questions when not put in issue by the parties
• warning courts to avoid dicta on conflicts questions when not put in issue
• Pennsylvania would adhere to traditional substance/procedure distinction for things routinely labeled as procedural by the Pennsylvania courts.
• F.A.A. airworthiness directives impugning the mechanical safety of the model of a plane whose crash was at issue admissible
• state has an interest in having its rules applied to insurance contracts purchased by its residents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).