Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing appropriateness, in some circumstances, of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and remanding for determination of whether it should be awarded
• stating that there is no bright-line standard for determining what level of educational benefit is necessary
• stating that there are few differences between the IDEA’S affirmative duty and Section 504’s negative prohibition against discrimination on the basis of disability
• recognizing appropriateness, in some circumstances, of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and remanding for determination of whether it should be awarded
• recognizing appropriateness, in some circumstances, of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and remanding for determination of whether it should be awarded
• explaining that § 504 “prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in federally funded programs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).