In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the ultimate price paid by each class member for a product is not the focus in a case alleging price-fixing
• stating that properly constructed multiple regression models are one of the most mainstream ways to estimate damages in antitrust litigation
• holding Illinois Brick “does not preclude a suit by a plaintiff who purchases directly from the alleged offender ... but buys a product which incorporates the price-fixed product as one of its ingredients”
• collecting cases and identifying multiple regression analysis as “one of the mainstream tools in economic study”
• rejecting defendants' contention that diverse products, markets, and pricing would prevent proof of an overarching conspiracy
• noting predominance test is met in antitrust case because “consideration of the conspiracy issue would, of necessity, focus on defendants’ conduct, not the individual conduct of the putative class members.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation Mdl
  Third Circuit· 2004-09-29· cited 242×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 138×
• In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2001-03-14· cited 80×
• Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. Kgaa
  District of Columbia· 2002-02-25· cited 75×
• Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2001-07-02· cited 64×
• Dow Chemical Co. v. Seegott Holdings, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-09-29· cited 60×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-09-04· cited 57×
• In re Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation
  D. Delaware· 2002-08-30· cited 47×
• Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2008-07-01· cited 43×
• In Re Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2004-12-08· cited 40×
• Thomas & Thomas Rodmakers, Inc. v. Newport Adhesives & Composites, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2002-05-03· cited 39×
• In Re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation Mdl
  Third Circuit· 2002-04-26· cited 36×
• Elias v. Ungar's Food Products, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2008-06-30· cited 35×
• In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2008-07-18· cited 35×
• Fry v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-12-22· cited 34×
• In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2010-03-28· cited 32×
• In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
  D. Kansas· 2004-02-13· cited 31×
• In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-12-07· cited 24×
• BP America Production Co. v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-10-31· cited 23×
• Bunker's Glass Co. v. Pilkington PlC
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-06-28· cited 22×

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
• Hansberry v. Lee
  Supreme Court· 1940-11-12· cited 1,544×
• Holmberg v. Armbrecht
  Supreme Court· 1946-02-25· cited 1,492×
• Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
• Blackie v. Barrack
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
• In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John a
  Third Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
• In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices Litigation
  Third Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 840×
• In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-02-15· cited 761×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
• Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
  Second Circuit· 1968-03-08· cited 609×
• Baby Neal v. Casey
  Third Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
• Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1977-07-21· cited 553×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1982-07-16· cited 539×
• Eisenberg v. Gagnon
  Third Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1996-06-27· cited 418×
• In Re \Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381
  Second Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 411×
• In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1996-11-26· cited 208×
• Hassine v. Jeffes
  Third Circuit· 1988-04-29· cited 196×

Other cases named In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In Re: FLAT GLASS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
  Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation· 2008-06-10