In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs demonstrated a means of proving impact on a class-wide basis despite defendants’ arguments regarding variations in products and pricing
• holding, in similar factual situation, that claims of each class member were “identical” to those of named plaintiff and that typicality requirement was therefore satisfied
• stating that commonality “is easily met because it may be fulfilled by a single common issue”
• certifying nationwide classes in case alleg- ing conspiracy to restrict output of linerboard
• “Numerosity does not require evidence of the exact number or identification of the proposed class.”
• “Numerosity does not require evidence of the exact number or identification of the proposed class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 138×
• Thomas & Thomas Rodmakers, Inc. v. Newport Adhesives & Composites, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2002-05-03· cited 39×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-05· cited 36×
• In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2008-07-18· cited 35×
• In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
  D. Kansas· 2004-02-13· cited 31×
• Ross v. American Express Co.
  S.D. New York· 2010-01-22· cited 31×
• In re Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-05-13· cited 26×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-08-27· cited 26×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-12-12· cited 25×
• McDonough v. Toys\ R\ US, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-07-15· cited 22×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-09-24· cited 22×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-04-21· cited 22×
• Cohen v. Chicago Title Insurance
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-04-05· cited 22×
• In re Live Concert Antitrust Litigation
  C.D. California· 2007-10-22· cited 22×
• In re Safeguard Scientifics
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-08-26· cited 20×
• Richburg v. Palisades Collection LLC
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-01-28· cited 19×
• Alberton v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-01-31· cited 19×
• In re Foundry Resins Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-05-02· cited 16×
• Jackson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-08-31· cited 14×
• Bromine Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. Indiana· 2001-09-28· cited 13×

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
• Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,269×
• Califano v. Yamasaki
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,888×
• Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
• Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
• In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John a
  Third Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
• Baby Neal v. Casey
  Third Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
• Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1977-07-21· cited 553×
• Eisenberg v. Gagnon
  Third Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
• Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis Rosenstiel
  Third Circuit· 1970-06-08· cited 418×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1996-06-27· cited 418×
• United States v. McGlory
  Third Circuit· 1992-06-19· cited 264×
• Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1998-08-19· cited 243×
• United States v. Container Corporation of America
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-15· cited 219×
• In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1996-11-26· cited 208×
• Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-01-23· cited 207×
• Hassine v. Jeffes
  Third Circuit· 1988-04-29· cited 196×
• Lewis v. Curtis
  Third Circuit· 1982-03-03· cited 194×

Other cases named In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-05· cited 36×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-08-27· cited 26×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-12-12· cited 25×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-09-24· cited 22×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-04-21· cited 22×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-09-05· cited 11×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-08-25· cited 10×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-07-28· cited 10×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-08-27· cited 9×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-08-30· cited 7×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-07-30· cited 6×
• In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-08-24· cited 4×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2010-01-14· cited 1×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-09-02· cited 1×
• In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2010-01-14