Skip to main content
· 7/16/1982

Federal Case

Citations

  • 685 F.2d 810
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 513
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 1621
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \matters of docket control . . . are committed to the sound discretion of the district court\
  • noting that the manner in which a court disposes of cases on its docket is within its discretion
  • noting that courts have broad discretion in the management of the discovery process.
  • requiring showing of prejudice to prevail on challenge to discovery procedures
  • “[M]atters of docket control . . . are committed to the sound discretion of the District Court.”
  • \[M]atters of docket control ... are committed to the sound discretion of the District Court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.