N.D. California· 7/18/2008

In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation

Citations

253 F.R.D. 478
2008 WL 2788089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

striking five regressions contained in expert’s reply declaration, which were not included in the expert’s initial report, as pro cedurally improper
denying certification of antitrust class 7 where evidence demonstrated putative class members purchased entirely different products at 8 different prices
determining the class certification issue one month before the non-expert discovery cut-off date
“The wholesale purchasers therefore came 12 to the negotiating table in a fundamentally different position than the representative [individual consumer] plaintiffs.”
“[Wholesale purchasers [ ] came to the negotiating table in a fundamentally different position than the representative plaintiffs.”
“[I]t is essential that plaintiffs establish that the requirements of Rule 23 have been met. This inquiry necessarily touches on evidence relating to the merits of the ease, namely, the proposed methodology of [plaintiffs’ expert].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alsup

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.