Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing sex composition of “claims adjusters” and “claims representatives” which have similar requirements.
• “[T]he procedural protections of (b)(3), opting out and notice, are necessary because of the heterogeneity of the (b)(3) class. They are unnecessary for the homogeneous (b)(2) class”
• former female employees who had voluntarily resigned and were not seeking reinstatement could represent class of past, present and future female technical employees
• former employees who voluntarily terminate their employment are able to represent adequately a class of presently employed persons, absent a showing of genuinely antagonistic interests.
• former employees who voluntarily terminate their employment are able to represent adequately a class of presently employed persons, absent a showing of genuinely antagonistic interests.
• practices of assigning women to segregated jobs from which promotional opportunities were limited constituted “continuing violations of Title VII and would allow filing a charge at anytime by a present employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).