Skip to main content
D. New Jersey· 3/22/2016

In re Lamictal Indirect Purchaser & Antitrust Consumer Litigation

Citations

  • 172 F. Supp. 3d 724
  • 2016 WL 1135368
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Act does not confer an independent basis for federal jurisdiction
  • “allegation that the settlement agreement between GSK and Teva led them to pay inflated prices for lamotrigine tablets is sufficient to meet [the antitrust injury] standard.
  • allegation that the settlement agreement between GSK and Teva led thern to pay inflated prices for lamotrigine tablets is sufficient to meet [the antitrust injury] standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

106 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.