N.D. California· 8/25/2008

In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

Citations

586 F. Supp. 2d 1109
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65535
2008 WL 3916309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that markets for products and sub-products contained in the product were “inextricably linked”
identifying traceable antitrust injury across market for TFT-LCD panels and market for finished products containing TFT-LCD panels
refusing to dismiss RIUTPCPA claim because plaintiffs alleged that defendant “engaged in ‘unfair or deceptive’ acts” that “mis[led] or deceive[d]” consumers and resulted in injury to Rhode Island consumers
dismissing a claim without leave to amend where the plaintiff did not address the defendant’s arguments
denying a motion to dismiss “[t]o the extent that defendants raise questions about the scope of the market” because that is a factual question
granting a motion to dismiss a claim without leave to amend after noting that plaintiffs’ opposition did not address defendants' arguments regarding the claim, and that plaintiffs had therefore abandoned the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Susan Illston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.