Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/18/1996
In re Daniel H.
Citations
- 237 Conn. 364
- 678 A.2d 462
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “the removal of a right to a direct appeal [of a juvenile transfer order] is also a substantive change in the law” that applies only prospectively and not retroactively to cases predating statutory amendment
- statute eliminating the right of a juvenile to take interlocutory appeal from a transfer order affects a juvenile’s substantive interests and therefore may not be applied retroactively
- to determine whether change in law is retro- active as applied to specific crime, court looks to date of crime
- statutory amendment removing right to direct appeal from juvenile transfer order is substantive
- construing mandatory juvenile transfer statute
- construing mandatory juvenile transfer statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-09· cited 209×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-16· cited 119×
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-01· cited 52×
- State v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-18· cited 48×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-08-21· cited 38×
- Loulis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 38×
- Andersen Consulting, LLP v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-03-27· cited 38×
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-24· cited 35×
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 34×
- In Re Shane B.Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-07-27· cited 32×
- State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-01-15· cited 32×
- State v. ParraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-14· cited 29×
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-28· cited 27×
- McKay v. LongmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-07-23· cited 23×
- State v. QuinetSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-22· cited 23×
- Davis v. Forman SchoolConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-09-14· cited 20×
- Town of Middlebury v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 18×
- General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-10-13· cited 18×
- State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-01· cited 17×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 261×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-06· cited 75×
- State v. DolphinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-19· cited 56×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-02-26· cited 55×
- In re Judicial Inquiry No. 85-01Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-14· cited 51×
- Miano v. ThorneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-26· cited 35×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-23· cited 32×
- State v. MillhouseConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-04-09· cited 29×
- In re Luis R.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-04· cited 22×
- State v. CrowellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-25· cited 22×
- In re Tyvonne M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-09· cited 19×
- In re Bromell G.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-03· cited 11×
- In re Michael C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-09-28· cited 1×
- In re Daniel H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-09-28· cited 1×
- In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-09-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.