In re Bromell G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \a plaintiff's ability to rely on § 52-592 is limited to those cases where the § 251 dismissal is rendered after the case failed because of accident or simple negligence\
• juvenile matter not automatically stayed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Daniel H.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-18· cited 68×
• In re Edwin N.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-12· cited 10×
• In re David M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-11-17· cited 9×
• In re Prudencio O.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-06-21· cited 8×
• In re Ernest B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-12-01· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• State v. Curcio
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 442×
• State v. Grotton
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-15· cited 50×
• State v. Spendolini
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-25· cited 44×
• Brooks v. Winter
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 34×
• State v. Torres
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-23· cited 32×
• State v. Seravalli
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-08· cited 31×
• State v. Van Sant
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-21· cited 30×