State v. Bischoff
Citations
- 337 Conn. 739
Syllabus
Pursuant to statute (§ 54-194), ''[t]he repeal of any statute defining or pre- scribing the punishment for any crime shall not affect any pending prosecutions or any existing liability to prosecution and punishment therefor, unless expressly provided in the repealing statute that such repeal shall have that effect.'' Pursuant further to statute (§ 1-1 (t)), ''[t]he repeal of an act shall not affect the punishment, penalty or forfeiture incurred before the repeal takes effect . . . .'' The defendant was convicted of and sentenced to an effective term of incarceration of five years for possession of narcotics, among other crimes, in connection with events that occurred in 2014. After the defen- dant's arrest but prior to his conviction in 2016, the legislature amended the statute (§ 21a-279) under which the defendant was convicted, effec- tive October 1, 2015, by changing possession of narcotics from a class D felony with a maximum sentence of seven years of imprisonment to a class A misdemeanor with a maximum sentence of one year of imprisonment. After the defendant unsuccessfully appealed from the judgment of conviction, he filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence, arguing, inter alia, that the legislature had intended its 2015 amendment to § 21a-279 to apply retroactively. The trial court dismissed the motion to correct, and the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, which directed the trial court to deny rather than to dismiss the defendant's motion, concluding, inter alia, that the 2015 amendment did not apply retroactively. On the granting of certification, the defendant appealed to this court. Held: 1. The Appellate Court correctly determined that the defendant was properly sentenced in accordance with the version of § 21a-279 that was in effect when he committed the crimes of which he was convicted: this court has interpreted §§ 54-194 and 1-1 (t) to embody a presumption that changes to criminal statutes prescribing or defining punishment apply prospe
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Kahn; Ecker; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Edge Fitness, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-01-25· cited 20×
- State v. LangstonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-06-06· cited 15×
- State v. Adam P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. HurdleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-12-10· cited 10×
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-01-21· cited 6×
- William W. Backus Hospital v. StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-12· cited 4×
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-16· cited 4×
- In re ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-07-18· cited 3×
- State v. Joseph V.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-13· cited 2×
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-10-21
- L. H.-S. v. N. B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-12-15
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 2,432×
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 261×
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 243×
- People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals· 1956-04-26· cited 172×
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-26· cited 74×
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-22· cited 70×
- Scillion v. CowanSupreme Court· 1975-11-03· cited 69×
- In re Daniel H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-18· cited 68×
- People v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 62×
- Buchanan Et Al. v. Evans Et Al.Supreme Court· 1975-12-12· cited 61×
- State v. CarboneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-01-18· cited 54×
- Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-25· cited 51×
- State v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-18· cited 48×
- Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 46×
- Harlow v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-07· cited 44×
- Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-26· cited 39×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-08-21· cited 38×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-24· cited 36×
- State v. ZachSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-24· cited 36×
- Lucky Stores, Inc. v. HolihanSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.