Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/19/1988

In Re AW

Citations

765 P.2d 307
53 Wash. App. 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding one year was not within near future of three-year-old and noting, “Although 1 year may not be a long time for an adult decisionmaker, for a young child it may seem like forever.”
holding one year was not within near future of three-year-old and noting, “Although 1 year may not be a long time for an adult decisionmaker, for a young child it may seem like forever.”
termination hearing, for the purposes of notice and appearance requirements, is a proceeding separate from any dependency proceedings
a party's subsequent participation in dependency review hearings and a termination adjudication may render harmless any due process violations at the initial hearing
for this reason, it is particularly appropriate to strictly apply the waiver provisions of CR 12(h)(1) in dependency and termination proceedings
“Although 1 year may not be a long time for an adult decision maker, for a young child it may seem like forever.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re AW

120 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.