In re A.W.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3198
Syllabus
JUVENILE – Dependency; motion for custody of adjudicated dependent minor; objection to magistrate's decision; trial court sustained objection; trial court applied incorrect legal standard by determining that father's wish to parent was controlling standard; father implicitly deemed unsuitable; fundamental inquiry is whether custody with a previously adjudicated parent is in the best interest of the child; trial court erred in determining that placement with father was in minor child's best interest.
Judges: Eklund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 446×
- Hockstok v. HockstokOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-27· cited 210×
- In re L.L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-05· cited 11×
- In re P.V.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.