In re the Welfare of Aschauer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when considering a parent’s efforts, this court considers whether the parent has ignored or refused to participate in the plans required by the state
• noting that, when considering a parent's efforts, this court considers whether the parent has ignored or refused to participate in the plans required by the state
• noting that a father's 13-year-old conviction for the statutory rape of two girls, aged 13 and 14, \does not necessarily demonstrate a propensity * * * to be a threat to his toddler son\
• noting that a father’s 13-year-old conviction for the statutory rape of two girls, aged 13 and 14, “does not necessarily demonstrate a propensity * * * to be a threat to his toddler son”
• interpreting ORS 419B.476(2)(a), where case plan at time of hearing is reunification, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction
• a parent’s progress is assessed with reference to the “barrier to reunification * * * identified in the dependency petition and the applicable case plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).