Skip to main content

In Re Roberts

Citations

  • 732 P.2d 528
  • 46 Wash. App. 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying dual burden of proof, requiring proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” that continuation of custody would cause child harm, but only “clear and convincing evidence” of the state termination grounds
  • proof beyond reasonable doubt that parent’s custody likely to result in Indian child’s emotional or physical damage in addition to state parental termination requirements
  • no abuse of discretion where witness had attended numerous workshops on Indian child welfare and was a committee member for two organizations involved in drafting ICWA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.